No Minimum Deposit Casino Australia 2026: What the Marketing Doesn’t Tell You

“No minimum deposit” sits somewhere between a promise and a punchline. On the landing page, it reads like an open door: walk in, drop a coin, play the pokies. At the cashier, the door narrows. Most Australian-facing casinos will let you deposit $10. A few will take $5. Almost none will take $1 without attaching a condition that makes the dollar irrelevant. The gap between the advert and the actual transaction is where this guide lives.

The short version: there is no Australian-licensed online casino taking real-money pokies from domestic players in 2026. Every “no minimum deposit casino Australia” you see advertised is offshore, licensed by Curaçao, Anjouan, Kahnawake, or Malta, and operating in a legal grey zone that the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 was designed to close but hasn’t quite managed to enforce. That doesn’t make the offers fake. It does make the terms, the payment rails, and the withdrawal mechanics worth understanding before you send anyone your banking details.

What follows is a working breakdown of the operators that actually accept small Australian deposits, the payment methods that make micro-stakes possible, the withdrawal minimums that claw the money back, and the legal framework that shapes the whole market. No hype. No “exclusive bonus” theatre. Just the numbers and the fine print.

What “No Minimum Deposit” Actually Means in the Australian Market

The phrase gets used three different ways, often by the same operator on the same page. First, it can mean a no-deposit bonus: free spins or bonus credit handed over at registration without a cent leaving your bank account. Second, it can mean a low cashier floor: the minimum amount the payment system will accept, usually $5–$10. Third, it can mean a marketing claim that collapses the moment you open the bonus terms and find a separate “minimum qualifying deposit” of $20.

The distinction matters because the economics of each model are completely different. A no-deposit bonus is an acquisition cost. The casino is buying a registration with free spins, hoping a fraction of claimants convert to depositors. A $5 minimum deposit is a payment processing decision. Card rails charge fixed fees per transaction, so sub-$5 deposits lose the operator money before the player spins once. That is why the cashier floor and the bonus floor rarely match.

The difference between a no-deposit bonus and a $1 minimum

A no-deposit bonus is not a deposit at all. It is a conditional grant of bonus credit or free spins, usually with a wagering requirement of 35× to 50× and a maximum cashout that caps the upside. A typical Australian-facing offer in 2026 looks like 50 to 100 free spins at A$0.10–$0.20 per spin, 40× wagering, and a maximum cashout of A$100. You are not depositing a dollar; you are accepting a lottery ticket with a known price and a capped prize.

A $1 minimum deposit is different. Your dollar becomes real balance (or bonus balance, depending on the operator), and the casino’s cashier accepts the transaction. The difficulty is that very few payment rails can process a $1 casino deposit without the fixed fee eating the margin. PayID technically has no functional minimum—NPP Australia does not enforce a floor—but the casino sets one because the reconciliation cost is the same whether you send $1 or $100. That is why the $1 deposit casino is mostly a headline, not a functioning cashier tier.

Why “no minimum” rarely means zero

Zero is expensive. A card transaction carries a fixed processing cost, a fraud-check cost, and a chargeback risk that does not shrink with the deposit size. Crypto rails remove the card network from the equation, but they introduce network fees and volatility exposure. Even the leanest offshore operation needs the deposit to cover the cost of accepting it. The floor that emerges in practice is $5 at a handful of crypto-friendly brands and $10 at most PayID-accepting operators.

There is also a regulatory shadow. Offshore casinos hold licences in jurisdictions with anti-money-laundering rules that require some level of transaction monitoring. A $1 deposit is not a money-laundering risk in isolation, but a pattern of $1 deposits from hundreds of accounts is a monitoring nightmare. The floor is partly a compliance filter, not just a payment-processing decision.

The cashier floor versus the bonus floor

Here is the split that catches most players. An operator might advertise “deposit from $1” on the landing page and set a $20 minimum qualifying deposit in the welcome bonus terms. The cashier will accept your dollar; the bonus engine will not count it. You end up with a real-money balance of $1 and no welcome package, which is not the offer the banner promised.

The practical rule: ignore the landing page. Open the bonus terms and find the line labelled “minimum deposit to qualify” or “minimum qualifying deposit.” That number, not the cashier floor, determines whether the welcome offer exists for you. The gap between the two is one of the most consistent pieces of fine print in the Australian-facing market.

The Legal Reality: Why Every “No Minimum Deposit Casino Australia” Is Offshore

The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 makes it an offence for a gambling provider to offer prohibited interactive gambling services to people in Australia. Online casino games—pokies, roulette, blackjack, poker—sit inside that prohibition. The offence falls on the provider, not the player. That legal asymmetry is the foundation of the entire offshore market: Australian players are not committing a crime by signing up to a Curaçao-licensed casino, but the operator is taking a regulatory risk by accepting them.

What the IGA does not do is make the offshore casino disappear. It makes the offshore casino the only option for Australian players who want real-money online pokies. The result is a market of roughly 150+ offshore brands targeting Australian traffic, with licences from Curaçao, Anjouan, Kahnawake, and Malta, and payment rails that range from PayID to Bitcoin to Neosurf vouchers. None of those licences give you recourse through Australian courts. Disputes go to the offshore regulator, which is slow, or to the operator’s internal complaints process, which is faster but not neutral.

What the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 prohibits

The IGA bans the provision of online casino-style games to Australian customers. It does not ban sports betting, which is licensed at state level, and it does not ban lotteries. The line is specifically drawn around casino games: pokies, table games, and the automated random-number-generated equivalents that offshore sites host. A domestic sportsbook like Sportsbet or Ladbrokes can take your bet on the AFL; it cannot offer you a Pragmatic Play slot.

Enforcement sits with the ACMA, which has taken a blocking approach rather than a prosecution-heavy approach. The regulator maintains a list of illegal gambling websites and works with internet service providers to block them. The practical effect is a whack-a-mole cycle: blocked domains reappear under new URLs, and offshore operators continue to accept Australian registrations through mirror sites and payment methods that do not route through Australian banks.

The 2026 reform act and what it changed (and didn’t)

The Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Act 2026 became law on 26 August 2026. It is the most significant reform to the framework since the original Act commenced in 2001. The headline measures are advertising restrictions: bans on wagering ads across broadcast, digital, and social media, with a phased implementation that runs into 2027. The Act also establishes the AdStop register, a single opt-out mechanism for Australians who want to stop seeing online gambling advertising.

What the reform did not do is legalise online casinos. The prohibition on providing casino-style games to Australian customers remains in place. The reform tightened the advertising perimeter around wagering, but it left the casino prohibition untouched. That means the offshore casino market that serves Australian players in 2026 will continue to operate under the same legal framework in 2027: offshore licence, offshore dispute resolution, no Australian consumer protection.

Offshore licences: Curaçao, Anjouan, Kahnawake, Malta

Curaçao is the most common licence in the Australian-facing market. The old Master Licence structure is transitioning to the Curaçao Gaming Control Board framework, which has introduced tighter capital and reporting requirements. Curaçao is cheaper than Malta and more common among crypto-focused brands. Anjouan and Comoros licences have grown quickly since 2023 because they are quick to issue and lightly supervised. Kahnawake, issued by the Mohawk Council in Canada, is worth knowing because several long-running Aussie-facing brands sit under it, including Fair Go Casino and Jackpot Jill, both of which have operated on the same licence since 2016.

Malta’s MGA licence is the strictest of the four. It requires higher capital reserves and operates a formal complaints mechanism, which gives players a slightly more structured dispute route. Very few Australian-facing casinos carry Malta, because the compliance cost is high relative to the grey-market revenue. The brands that do carry it tend to be larger European operators with Australian traffic as a secondary market.

A licence number in the footer is the minimum trust signal. A formal Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) provider listed alongside it is the stronger signal. If neither is present, the operator is telling you something about how it expects disputes to be resolved: badly.

Top No Minimum Deposit Operators for Australian Players in 2026

The ranking below is built around three practical criteria: whether the operator actually accepts small Australian deposits through a rail that works (PayID or crypto), whether the minimum withdrawal is low enough to make a small balance worth cashing out, and whether the withdrawal speed matches the marketing claim. We have not ranked on bonus size, because a large bonus on a high-wagering term is a worse deal than a small bonus on a clean term.

Quick comparison table

The table is a starting point, not a verdict. A low minimum deposit is irrelevant if the withdrawal minimum is high and the processing time is measured in days. A crypto-only operator with a $1 deposit floor and a $30 withdrawal minimum is a better deal for a micro-staker than a PayID operator with a $10 deposit floor and a $100 withdrawal minimum, because the crypto rail lets you test the full cycle with less capital at risk.

Operator-by-operator assessment

Bitstarz is the benchmark for crypto-first Australian-facing play. It has operated since 2014, holds a Curaçao licence, and processes crypto withdrawals in under 10 minutes on average, with a documented best case of three minutes. The minimum crypto deposit is low enough to test the withdrawal process with a tiny amount before committing real money. The trade-off is that fiat withdrawals are slower and the KYC threshold, while not aggressive, is real.

7Bit Casino runs a 7,500-plus game library across Pragmatic Play, NetEnt, Microgaming, Evolution, and Hacksaw Gaming, with a minimum crypto deposit around the equivalent of $1. The crypto withdrawal speed is competitive with Bitstarz, though fiat payouts average closer to two hours. For a player who wants to spin Microgaming pokies at a low stake and cash out through Bitcoin, 7Bit is a stronger fit than a PayID-only brand.

Rocket Casino is the most practical PayID option for a low-deposit player who does not want to touch crypto. The cashier floor sits around A$10–A$15 on PayID, the minimum withdrawal is A$30, and most cashouts under A$500 process without documents in one to four hours. The licence is Curaçao, and the game library leans on Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw titles. It is not the cheapest deposit floor in the market, but it is the most frictionless fiat route.

National Casino competes with Rocket on the same PayID rail and occasionally drops the cashier floor to A$5. The registration flow is faster, and the withdrawal time sits under 24 hours for most fiat requests. The trade-off is a slightly smaller game library and a bonus structure that leans on deposit tiers rather than pure no-deposit offers. For a player who wants a $5 test deposit and a $30 withdrawal, it is one of the few functioning options.

Hellspin carries a 4,000+ pokies library and a PayID floor of around A$20. The withdrawal minimum is higher (A$30–A$50), and fiat processing can stretch to three days. It is a better fit for a player who wants volume and provider variety rather than the absolute lowest floor. The crypto rail is available but less integrated than at Bitstarz or 7Bit.

Ozwin Casino and Fair Go Casino sit in the AUD-banking niche. Both accept Neosurf vouchers from A$10, both have minimum withdrawals around A$50, and both run Aussie-themed pokies libraries. Ozwin’s Neosurf and crypto rails process in 2–48 hours; Fair Go’s card and Neosurf withdrawals can take 2–5 days. They are not the fastest or the cheapest, but they are two of the longest-running brands in the market, and tenure on a single licence is a better trust signal than a fresh Anjouan certificate.

Payment Methods That Make Micro-Deposits Possible

The payment rail determines the floor more than the casino’s marketing does. A $1 deposit is impossible on a card rail with a fixed processing fee, difficult on a bank transfer, and routine on a crypto rail where the network fee is measured in cents. PayID sits in the middle: the rail itself has no functional minimum, but the casino sets a floor to make reconciliation worthwhile.

PayID: the $10 standard

PayID is Australia’s real-time bank payment system, operated by NPP Australia. It links a mobile number, email, or ABN to a BSB and account number and settles in under 60 seconds, 24/7, including public holidays. The casino does not charge a fee, and your bank does not charge a fee for sending the transfer.

The minimum PayID casino deposit at Australian-facing operators sits at A$10 for most brands in 2026. A handful go as low as A$5, and a few crypto-friendly platforms drop to A$5 on the PayID rail. The maximum ranges from A$5,000 to A$50,000 per transaction, though your bank’s own PayID cap applies first. The minimum is a casino-side rule, not a PayID limitation: NPP Australia does not enforce a floor, and technically a one-cent transfer would clear the rail.

One practical detail that causes avoidable delays: most casinos require a unique reference code in the transaction description. The code ties the payment to your player account. Skip it, and the deposit sits in a manual reconciliation queue, which can add 15–30 minutes to a process that should be instant.

Crypto: the sub-$5 rail

Crypto rails remove the card network and the bank from the deposit path. The minimum is set by the operator, not by a payment processor, and the network fee for a Tether transfer on the Tron network can sit under $1. That is why crypto casinos can advertise deposit floors that PayID operators cannot match.

The trade-off is friction at the on-ramp. Most Australian banks block direct crypto purchases to exchanges, so you need an existing crypto balance or a peer-to-peer on-ramp before you can deposit. The withdrawal side is faster: a Bitcoin withdrawal from a well-run crypto casino typically clears in 10–60 minutes once approved, and USDT-TRC20 can settle in under two minutes. The KYC threshold still exists, typically around A$1,000–A$3,000 for Curaçao-licensed brands, but small withdrawals often process without documents.

For a micro-staker, the crypto rail is the only way to test the full deposit–play–withdraw cycle with less than A$10 at risk. The network fee is a larger percentage of a $5 deposit than a $500 deposit, but it is still small in absolute terms, and the speed of the withdrawal tells you more about the operator than any review ever will.

Neosurf, PayPal, and the disappearing card option

Neosurf is a prepaid voucher system: you buy a voucher with a set denomination, usually A$10–A$200, and redeem it at a supported casino. It does not link your bank account or credit card directly, which is the privacy appeal. The limitation is that Neosurf is deposit-only at most Australian-facing casinos; you cannot withdraw back to the voucher, so you need a second rail (bank transfer, crypto, or MiFinity) for the cashout.

PayPal is the rail that never quite arrived in the offshore casino market. PayPal’s acceptable-use policy restricts gambling transactions in many jurisdictions, and most Curaçao-licensed casinos do not list it as a withdrawal option. A few operators accept PayPal deposits through intermediaries, but the withdrawal side is usually unavailable, which makes it a poor fit for a low-deposit player who wants a complete cycle.

Cards remain the slowest route. Visa and Mastercard cashouts from offshore casinos typically land in three to seven business days, sometimes longer if the operator batches payouts on weekdays. The deposit side is faster, but the fixed processing cost pushes the minimum deposit floor to $10–$20 at most brands, and the chargeback risk makes some operators reluctant to accept card deposits from new Australian accounts at all.

No Minimum Withdrawal: The Other Half of the Equation

A low deposit floor is meaningless if the withdrawal floor is high. A casino that accepts a $5 deposit and enforces a $50 minimum withdrawal is not a low-stakes casino; it is a casino that lets you deposit small and traps the balance until you either lose it or deposit more. The withdrawal minimum is the number that determines whether a micro-stake session can ever produce a cashout.

The minimum withdrawal trap

Most Australian-facing operators set the minimum withdrawal at A$30–A$50. A handful go lower: Winspirit lists A$20, and some crypto-first brands will process a $10–$20 crypto withdrawal. The higher floors are not arbitrary. Fiat withdrawals carry a fixed processing cost, and a $5 bank transfer costs the operator more than it costs you.

The trap is mathematical. If you deposit $10, run it up to $12, and the minimum withdrawal is $30, you cannot cash out. You have to keep playing until you either clear the floor or lose the balance. The casino does not need to confiscate your winnings; the withdrawal minimum does the work for it. That is why a $10 deposit at a casino with a $50 withdrawal minimum is a worse deal than a $10 deposit at a crypto casino with a $20 minimum, even if the second casino’s bonus terms are less generous.

KYC triggers and what “no verification” really means

“No verification withdrawal” is another phrase that means less than it appears to. Most offshore casinos will process small withdrawals without documents, but almost all of them have a KYC trigger somewhere between A$500 and A$3,000. Below the trigger, you might get paid without a passport scan. Above it, the compliance team asks questions, and the payout waits until the answers arrive.

The licence type shapes the trigger. Curaçao eGaming licences have historically imposed the lightest identity requirements, with unverified payout ceilings often between A$500 and A$2,500. Anjouan licences vary by operator. Costa Rica operates a registration system rather than a full gaming licence, which is why some brands there advertise the loosest terms. Australian-licensed operators sit at the opposite end: any operator holding an Australian licence must verify identity before the first withdrawal, which is one reason domestic sportsbooks cannot offer casino-style play.

The practical takeaway: a “no verification” casino is a casino with a threshold, not a casino with no KYC. If you plan to withdraw more than a few hundred dollars, assume documents will be requested and factor the delay into your decision.

Pokies and Slots: Where the Low-Stake Player Actually Plays

The pokies lobby is where the “no minimum deposit” promise gets tested most often. A $0.10 spin on Sweet Bonanza is a real-money spin, and a $5 deposit can buy 50 of them. The question is whether the volatility and RTP at that stake make the session worth starting.

Volatility and RTP at $0.10–$0.50 spins

Most Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming titles run RTP between 94% and 97%, with high volatility. A high-volatility slot at a $0.10 spin can burn through a $5 balance in a few minutes without a single bonus trigger. The same balance on a lower-volatility title might last an hour but produce smaller wins. Neither outcome is a malfunction; it is the maths of small samples. The RTP is a long-run average, and a $5 session is not a long run.

The practical implication is that a micro-deposit is better used to test the cashier and withdrawal process than to chase a win. Spin at the minimum, see whether the withdrawal clears at the other end, and treat the deposit as a fee for testing the operator. That is a more rational use of $10 than trying to turn it into $100 on a high-volatility slot.

Providers that matter for micro-staking

Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming dominate the Australian-facing pokies market. Gates of Olympus, Sweet Bonanza, Big Bass Bonanza, and Wanted Dead or a Wild are the titles most commonly attached to no-deposit free-spin offers, partly because their bet ranges accommodate A$0.10 spins. Microgaming titles remain relevant at 7Bit and other Microgaming-heavy operators, and Realtime Gaming (RTG) titles sit behind the Aussie-themed brands like Fair Go and Ozwin. NetEnt and Play’n GO fill the mid-volatility niche.

The provider list is not a quality ranking. It is a practical map: if you want to spin at A$0.10 and still have access to a full library, Pragmatic and Hacksaw are the safest bets. If you want RTG bonus features and an AUD-banking operator, Fair Go and Ozwin are the names that come up repeatedly.

How We Ranked These Casinos (Methodology)

We did not rank on bonus size. A 200% match up to $2,000 with 50× wagering is not a better offer than a $100 bonus with 30× wagering for a player depositing $20. We ranked on the metrics that determine whether a small deposit can become a real withdrawal.

What we tested and what we ignored

We tested the cashier floor on the rail that an Australian player can actually use: PayID where available, crypto where not. We checked the minimum withdrawal, because a low deposit floor with a high withdrawal floor is a trap. We checked the published processing time against user reports where available, and we checked whether the operator lists a licence number and an ADR provider in the footer. We ignored landing-page bonus claims, “exclusive” spin counts, and any offer that required a deposit above the cashier floor to qualify.

The result is a ranking that favours operators with a complete low-stakes cycle: a deposit rail that accepts $5–$10, a withdrawal minimum that a small balance can clear, and a processing time that does not turn a $20 cashout into a three-day wait. Bitstarz and 7Bit win on the crypto cycle; Rocket and National win on the PayID cycle; Ozwin and Fair Go win on AUD banking and tenure.

The Real Cost of a “No Minimum Deposit” Welcome Bonus

The welcome bonus is where the marketing budget goes, and it is where the player’s expected value goes to die. A “100% up to $500 + 200 free spins” headline sounds like free money. The terms attached to it usually make the bonus a liability rather than an asset for a micro-staker.

Wagering math on a $10 deposit

Take a typical offer: 100% match up to $500, 40× wagering on the bonus, 200 free spins at A$0.20 with winnings capped at A$100. If you deposit $10, you receive a $10 bonus. The wagering requirement is 40 × $10 = $400 in eligible bets before any bonus-derived winnings become withdrawable. At a $0.20 spin, that is 2,000 spins. At a 96% RTP, the expected loss on $400 of wagering is $16, which is more than the bonus. The maths is not designed to make you rich; it is designed to keep you playing.

The free spins are a separate calculation. Two hundred spins at A$0.20 is A$40 of spin value, but the winnings are bonus credit with their own wagering requirement and a maximum cashout. If the max cashout is A$100, the upside is capped at $100 regardless of how much the spins produce. The expected value of the spin package is positive in isolation but small relative to the time and variance involved.

Max cashout: the number nobody reads

The maximum cashout is the single most important number in a no-deposit or low-deposit bonus, and it is almost always buried below the wagering requirement. A 50-spin no-deposit offer with a A$100 max cashout gives you a capped lottery ticket. If the spins produce A$300 in winnings, you withdraw A$100 and forfeit the rest. The cap is not a penalty; it is the operator’s way of keeping the acquisition cost predictable.

For a micro-staker, the max cashout should be read alongside the minimum withdrawal. A $100 max cashout with a $50 minimum withdrawal is workable. A $50 max cashout with a $50 minimum withdrawal is effectively a binary outcome: you either clear the minimum or you cannot withdraw at all. The gap between the two numbers is where the bonus stops being a bonus.

Responsible Gambling in a Micro-Stake Environment

The behavioural risk of a low deposit floor is that it makes gambling feel cheap. A $5 deposit is less than a coffee. A $10 deposit is a sandwich. The small absolute amounts disguise the frequency: ten $5 deposits a week is $50, and the session length at a $0.10 spin can stretch for hours. The micro-stake model is designed to lower the barrier to entry, not to lower the risk.

The behavioural risk of tiny deposits

Small deposits also make it easier to chase. A player who would hesitate before depositing $100 might deposit $10 ten times without the same hesitation. The cumulative loss is the same, but the decision points are more frequent and each one feels trivial. That is the mechanism the low-floor model exploits, whether intentionally or not.

The practical safeguard is to set a weekly deposit limit in absolute terms, not per-transaction terms. A $50 weekly limit is a clearer boundary than a $10 per-deposit limit, because it caps the frequency as well as the size. Most offshore casinos offer deposit limits in the account settings, and some offer session-time reminders. They are not as robust as the Australian self-exclusion scheme, but they are the tools available in the offshore market.

Tools that actually work

BetStop is the Australian national self-exclusion register for online wagering. It covers licensed Australian sportsbooks and betting services. It does not cover offshore casinos, because they are not licensed in Australia. That is a structural gap: the register that works for domestic wagering does not reach the market where casino-style play actually happens.

For offshore play, the tools are operator-level: deposit limits, loss limits, session timeouts, and account closure. They work if you use them before the session, not during it. The other tool is the withdrawal test: make a small deposit, request a withdrawal immediately, and see how the operator handles it. A casino that pays a $20 withdrawal in an hour is a casino that respects small balances. A casino that stalls a $20 withdrawal for three days is telling you how it will handle a $200 withdrawal.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a genuinely no minimum deposit casino in Australia?

No Australian-licensed casino offers real-money online casino games, so every “no minimum deposit” option is offshore. The cashier floor at those operators is rarely zero: most PayID casinos set a A$10 minimum, and crypto casinos go as low as A$1–A$5 equivalent. The phrase usually refers to a no-deposit bonus, not a functioning zero-dollar cashier tier.

What is the lowest deposit I can make at an Australian-facing casino?

The practical floor is A$5 at a handful of crypto-friendly operators and A$10 at most PayID operators. A $1 deposit is occasionally accepted on crypto rails, but the bonus terms usually require a higher qualifying deposit, so the dollar does not unlock the welcome offer. PayID itself has no functional minimum; the casino sets the floor.

Can I withdraw a small balance from a no minimum deposit casino?

Yes, but the withdrawal minimum matters more than the deposit minimum. Most operators set a A$30–A$50 minimum withdrawal, so a $10 balance cannot be cashed out until it grows. Crypto-first brands like Bitstarz and 7Bit often have lower crypto withdrawal minimums and faster processing, which makes a small cashout more viable.

Are no minimum deposit casinos legal for Australian players?

The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 prohibits operators from offering casino-style games to Australian customers, but the offence falls on the provider, not the player. Australian players are not committing a crime by using an offshore casino. The trade-off is that disputes go to the offshore regulator, not an Australian court, and there is no access to Australian consumer protections.

Which payment method is best for a low deposit in Australia?

PayID is the most practical fiat rail: it settles in under 60 seconds, charges no fees, and most operators set a A$10 minimum. Crypto is better for the absolute lowest floor and the fastest withdrawal, but the on-ramp friction is higher. Neosurf is useful for privacy but is deposit-only at most casinos, so you need a second rail for the cashout.

Do no minimum deposit bonuses have wagering requirements?

Almost always. A typical no-deposit offer carries 35×–50× wagering on any winnings, plus a maximum cashout of A$50–A$100. The wagering requirement applies to the bonus-derived winnings, not the bonus itself, and the max cashout caps the upside regardless of how much the spins produce. Read both numbers before claiming the offer.